Intelligent Design Theory of the Proton, Neutron and Electron vs. The Ernest Ritherford

At the risk of being labeled a crank, the following pages will show you that the solar system-like Ernest Rutherford and Niels Bohr models of the atom do not include a single scientific fact. What is an atom and what are the parts of an atom? Intelligent Design theory shows that nothing about the proton, neutron and electron suggests the solar system concept of the atom of Niels Bohr and Ernest Rutherford. Likewise, the quantum physics of Max Born, the wave mechanics of Louis De Broglie, Schrödinger, Dirac and the uncertainty principle of indeterminacy of Werner Heisenberg are all based on mathematics and speculation without any regard to the proven electronic nature of the electron, proton or neutron.

The nature of electricity was discovered by many researchers prior to 1850. It began thousands of years ago when amber rubbed with fur was found to attract other materials. Without writing an entire book on this subject, let me mention that beginning in 1600, William Gilbert experimented with various electrostatic materials and magnets, followed by Niccolo Cabeo about 1640, Isaac Newton in 1704, S. Gray (1729) and C. F. de DuFay (1733). Then C. A. Coulomb determined the inverse square law of electrical attraction and repulsion in 1785, followed by L. Galvani's experiments with frog legs. In 1800 A. Volta made the first battery and Nicholson and Carlisle used it to decompose water into hydrogen and oxygen.. H. C. Oersted discovered in 1819 that a magnetic field surrounds a current-carrying wire. A. M. Ampere, Boit and Savart developed laws of current in one wire related to force and currents in neighboring wires in 1820. Seebeck discovered thermoelectric effects resulting from temperature differences in 1821, G. F. Ohm established the relationship between resistance, voltage and current in 1827, and in 1831 and 1832, Michael Faraday discovered induction by changing magnetic fields.

Many books and papers were written about the nature of electricity, including those by J. C. Maxwell, A. A. Michelson, H. v. Helmholtz and G. N. Lewis.

But about 1850 is when progress really began on the existence and nature of electrons and protons, actually beginning in 1705 when sparks were generated further in rarified air than in atmospheric air. W. Watson discovered a glow in a glass tube of rarified air carrying a current in 1748, as Faraday discovered glows of a different nature in 1838. This began the discoveries of cathode rays, x-rays and radioactive rays and their characteristics, the measurement of the velocity of electrons by J. J. Thomson after discoveries by Heinrich Hertz and Philipp Lenard and others. It took the work of a many great researchers, including the great scientist Ernest Rutherford, to finally determine the charge and mass of electrons and protons from that time until the 1920's. And ten thousand praises heaped upon each one of these researchers would not be enough to cover their time and effort and thought. If these discoveries had not been made before the LORD taught me the true structure of the atom and the cause of gravity, what I have put together that follows would be total nonsense. Also, the research I did in electron ballistics years earlier enabled the LORD to use me as His student. It turns out that the true structure of the atom by Intelligent Design makes total sense. And the unproven theoretical imaginations of strictly theoretical physicists of today are what appears to be total nonsense.

As we study the difference between a proton, neutron and an electron, we begin to realize that there is not one thing scientific about the famous Ernest Rutherford and Niels Bohr model of the atom that resembles a solar system, beginning with the size of the proton compared to the electron, and ignores all the characteristics of these two particles. Since Charles Darwin, science has become more fantasy than reality.

The Rutherford gold foil experiment was really an experiment done by Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden in 1909 - 1911 under the direction of Ernest Rutherford at the University of Manchester. Alpha particles from radium were directed toward a gold sheet that had a zinc sulfide (ZnS) sheet behind it. The ZnS lit up as the particles scattered and struck the ZnS. The alpha particles were supposed to go straight through the gold, and many of them did, but some were deflected at all different angles.

It was a very good experiment, and I can only conclude that the orientation of the gold atoms caused scattering. This flawed experiment contributed to the unscientific solar system model of the Rutherford-Bohr atom. That model does not embrace a single scientific fact of what we know about protons and electrons.

Alpha particles are actually helium, in which the two outer electrons are emitted as beta particles, leaving the helium with a positive charge of +2.When the positively charged helium approaches the protons in any of the atoms shown in my structure of the atom, you can see that they are repelled or deflected by whatever angle the protons in the atoms they are directed toward happens to be physically oriented. Also, the outer electrons in the gold atoms would attract the positively charged alpha particles as they passed through, causing the rays of alpha particles to bend. The alpha particles are so massive compared to the mass of an electron that they would not attach to the outer electrons, but simply be deflected as they passed by the electrons.

So the true structure of the atom as I believe is confirmed by the angles that were produced by the deflected alpha particles in the gold foil experiment. The odd angle of deflection or rebound would not necessarily coincide with the surface of the gold leaf, but simply the physical orientation of the protons and electrons in the gold cluster. So any conclusions drawn from the gold leaf experiment would be speculative theory, and the protons of my structure of the atom explain the deflection and rebound much better.

The scientific facts about electrons, protons and neutrons that are ignored in the solar system atom of Rutherford and Bohr are in almost every electronics and physics textbook that is permitted to be used in our government-controlled schools. Yet they are ignored by our feeble minds. Instead we go off into an imaginative world of quantum physics, Big Bang, black holes, string theories, antimatter and other universes to blindly ignore the truths taught in our textbooks and to believe in evolution.

I strongly urge you, dear reader, to click on NEXT PAGE that you will find at the bottom of each of the following pages to learn the truth about protons, electrons and neutrons followed by the truth about atoms. We can only conclude that atoms are not an accident as evolutionists would have you believe; they can only be the results of Intelligent Design. It is foolishness to measure truth and error by our own meager mental capacity. The Bible says this simply, "Be still, and know that I am God (Psalm 46:10)". Then the true answers will come.

What is an atom? How many hydrogen components are there? The Niels Bohr model of the atom taught that there are three components of a hydrogen atom, the proton, neutron and electron, The proton and electron forming a nucleus and electrons spinning around the nucleus like a solar system. We are now going to see the true formation of hydrogen with a picture of the hydrogen atom. This model of the hydrogen atom has only two components: two protons, two electrons and no nucleus. It is nothing like the Niels Bohr model of the atom.

To this day, no one can explain what light is, and many of God's other creations, such as gravity or how two particles, the proton and electron were originally coded to combine to make the almost infinite number of animate self-replicating or inanimate inventions, all in harmony with one another. Let us consider for a moment then, the proton and electron. What is your body made of? The proton and electron. What is the air you breathe made of? The proton and electron. What is the food you eat made of? The proton and electron. What is every chemical element made of? The proton and electron. If you were made of dust, as we are told in Genesis, what is dust made of? The proton and electron. If you are made of food instead of dust, what is food made of? The proton and electron.

The proton and electron are attracted to each other. One electron and one proton make a neutron. A neutron can only survive for an average of fifteen and a half minutes, our textbooks teach us. During that time, it will either fly apart, or combine with another neutron to make H₂. The textbook hydrogen atom model parts are only a proton-electron neutron, the combination of one electron and one proton. The so-called hydrogen atom model (H) does not exist for long.

H₂, however, is the stable combination of two neutrons. Therefore, I call H₂ a hydrogen atom, the first atom model. The Helium atom model structure and picture is the combination of two H₂ atoms. The Lithium atom model is the combination of three H₂ atoms. The Beryllium atom model and structure is the combination of four H₂ atoms, The boron element atom model of five, the carbon atom model structure and picture of six, nitrogen of seven, oxygen of eight, fluorine of nine, sodium ten, magnesium eleven H₂ atoms, and so on. I built models of these chemical elements, with the proton 1836 times the size of the electron and discus shaped, having a positive charge on only one side of the discus, but with the electron enlarged for the purpose of the models. I constructed these into each element up to carbon. I was surprised to discover that the carbon atom model that I made was octahedron-shaped. This is the shape of pure diamond crystals found in nature. Diamonds are pure carbon crystals. Likewise, the shape of the beryllium atom is the same shape as a beryllium crystal. Such a configuration is not possible with the Niels Bohr solar system model of the atom or the many other models based on the Ernest Rutherford - Niels Bohr model of the atom.

The proton attracts an electron to it with almost the same force that two electrons repel each other. When two electrons are 10^-19 meters apart they have repulsion for one another of about nine billion tons. Likewise, when two protons are 10^-19 meters apart they have repulsion for one another of almost nine billion tons. When an electron and a proton are slightly greater than 10^-19 meters apart, they have an attraction of almost nine billion tons. So you can imagine the acceleration toward one another involved when the two combine to make a neutron. This is the atomic energy that scientists call fusion. Because neutrons fly apart rather than fusing together to make a single particle, it must be that closer than 10^-19 meters apart, they repel each other. And the closer they get to one another, the more they repel each other. Otherwise, the attraction would become near infinite and protons and electrons would either fuse or annihilate each other. It seems to be beyond coincidence that they cannot touch. The electron is extremely light, so it shoots away from the proton, but then is attracted back, and again is repelled.

The next figure shows a so-called neutron model with electron-proton parts. The repulsion and attraction continue as the oscillations increase until within twenty minutes, they fly apart. When they fly apart, they cause a chain reaction that causes nearby atoms to fly apart. This is the atomic energy that scientists call fission.

What does atomic energy have to do with the speed of light? The answer is, "Nothing". The heat and light produced by an electron attracted to a proton or by an electron and proton flying apart is equal to the masses of the electron and proton times one-half the velocity of each particle squared, whatever those velocities are. Einstein's energy E = mc² where m is the mass and c is the velocity of light is pure speculation. The velocity of light introduced in E = mc² for Einstein's relativity speed of light equation is a figment of other scientists' imagination. The true energy is the velocity of the electrons which have one mass and the velocity of the protons, which have a far different mass. We know that kinetic energy (KE) equals ½ mass times velocity squared (KE = ½ mv²) for each particle.Einstein guessed that nothing can move faster than the speed of light and that this is the velocity of particles racing away from each other; so he substituted the speed of light squared for the velocity of the particles squared. And since we have discovered that the speed of light is not constant, what relation to the velocity of the fission or fusion particles is the velocity of light? Einstein's equation makes an interesting guess of the magnitude of the energy in matter, and so has been accepted as fact by the scientific community, even if Einstein's guess is at least double or more the actual energy, assuming the material completely disintegrates, which it does not.

The next page shows a picture of the so-called atom hydrogen, which is really a picture of a neutron. We will learn that there are not 3 components of a hydrogen atom, but two; two protons and two electrons make up the true model of the hydrogen atom, which then becomes the building block for a picture of a helium atom, a 3D picture of a lithium atom, a beryllium atom, boron atom, and then a carbon atom model, which is the same shape as a diamond. You will learn that the Ernest Rutherford and Niels Bohr model of the atom does not include a single scientific fact. A complete understanding of electrons and protons reveals that nothing about the proton, neutron and electron suggests the solar system concept of the Rutherford - Bohr model of the atom.