INTELLIGENT DESIGN THEORY – CREATIONISM VS. EVOLUTION AND THE WORLD'S THREE MOST IMPORTANT YET MOST DISBELIEVED EVENTS
Go to the Beginning of This Chapter
1.
Black Holes, Red Shift and
Big Bang
Intelligent Design Theory
gives evidence that evolution based on what is the big bang theory, black holes in space, red shift, the expanding universe theory and time of creation is based on speculation
rather than science. Big Bang theory, the expanding universe theory and age of
the earth and age of the universe are all based on the red shift of light from stars. This red shift is
not caused by what the Big Bang theory is and the so-called expanding universe, but
by slowing of the speed of light from dust and gas in space, as the ionization of
gas in front of
comets in space clearly shows, and as hundreds of
photos of dust and gas in front of comets in space
clearly show. The changing speed of light with time and red shift due to dust
and gas in space correct the time of creation from billions of years to six
thousand years.
The parallax error method and
Cepheid star variable method of determining the distance of stars may be good
approximations of distances of stars. But the red shift method of measuring the
velocity of stars and the expanding universe theory are highly questionable, as is super massive black holes in space theory. While these theories have been accepted
as fact, there is reason to believe that they are false assumptions.
In 1842, Christian Doppler
postulated that the color of light from a star approaching us would be shifted
toward blue and the color of light from a star going away from us would be a
red shift. Suppose instead, that red shift is primarily caused by
dust and gas in space rather than by stars racing away from us and blue shift is caused by
a lack of dust and gas in the space around the star. We then would have science
based on a false assumption of an expanding universe and that the stars are racing away from us.
Building on what may be a
false assumption by Doppler, in 1929 astronomer Edwin Powell Hubble came to
what may be a false conclusion that the amount of red shift of light coming
from stars and galaxies is related to the velocity of the stars racing away
from the earth and the expanding universe theory. The astronomer Hubble also found that the farther the stars are
from the earth, the greater the red shift, and therefore, the greater the
velocities and the expanding universe theory. Hubble also found that if red shift is double that of another star,
that star is twice as far away. This can be a good assumption of the distance,
but I discovered that the reason for double the red shift with distance very
coincidentally happens to be the same if the light is passing through twice as
much dust and gas in space. The astronomer Edwin Powell Hubble's conclusions led to the
questionable conclusion that stars are accelerating away from each other, and
the conclusions of subsequent scientists that beyond a certain distance from
the earth the stars are traveling at much greater velocities than the speed of
light. Yet their hero's Albert Einstein theory said it is impossible for any
object to exceed the speed of light because at the speed of light, its mass becomes
infinite. If this were true, the mass of any material on earth would increase
as its temperature increases, because the frequency of the electron vibrations
increase, and hence the velocity of the vibrating electrons increase until the
material glows (reaches the frequency of light). If this were sound reasoning,
the mass of an electron emitting light is infinite instead of remaining
constant.
Both Einstein's theory and astronomer
Hubble's discovery were quickly accepted by the scientific community. From
this, scientists arrived at the dubious "Big Bang" theory that all
the galaxies in the universe started out the size of a pinhead and exploded to
form all the hundreds of billions of galaxies, each galaxy having about a
hundred billion stars. The Big Bang Theory takes an enormous amount of
imagination and faith, and yet was readily accepted.
The time of creation given in
the Bible as about 4,000 BC is ridiculed because from the distances of the
stars and the supposed constancy of the speed of light, they concluded that the
universe is somewhere between twelve and twenty billion years old. How could we
possibly see the stars if the universe is only 6000 years old, they
argued, when it takes twelve to twenty
billion years for the light of the stars to reach us? Falsities should not be
taught in schools unless taught as unproven assumptions. All this makes sense
when conflicting science is prohibited
(See Chapters 7 and 20* of my book Intelligent Design Theory), and encompasses the commonly accepted
theories leading to the supposed age of the universe.
False assumptions can only lead to false conclusions. As a result, the scientific community concluded that enough time has passed that evolution is not only possible, but an absolute fact. This is the result of false "scientific proof" based on the time it takes the light from stars to reach us, and the time it would take to get where we are as a result of the Big Bang. Even if the earth is billions of years old, this does not prove that it was not created by an Intelligent Designer. These false conclusions disregard the obvious violations of the Einstein Relativity and the Speed of Light and the obvious observation that it would be impossible to pack all the enormous amount of matter in the universe into a pinhead.
Black Holes in space and what
is the Big
Bang theory contradict each other. What the Big Bang Theory claims that massive matter
explodes. Black Holes in space theorists claim that massive matter annihilates
itself. Which is true and which is false? Intelligent Design Theory tells us that
both Big Bangs in space and Black Holes in space theory are false, as we shall
see.
Another possible false theory
is the expanding universe theory that the stars are accelerating away from us and the universe is expanding
faster than the speed of light. This contradicts the Einstein theory that
nothing can move faster than the speed of light. The Big Bang would give the
stars an initial velocity. They would then decelerate due to gravitational
attraction, not accelerate. To counteract this, scientists have now come up
with another unproven theory: that empty space has repulsive energy that they
call "dark energy"! One false theory begets another.
Astronomer Hubble's
conclusion from red shift is in direct opposition to the Einstein theory of
constancy of the speed of light. Red shift of light is not caused by velocity,
but by dust and gas. Scientists explain the conflict with the speed of light
not as a slowing of the speed of light, but as a slowing of the frequency of
the light as the stars move away from us due to the expanding universe theory.
Einstein's theory that all motions are relative is ignored. According to
Einstein, to one standing on a star, there is no motion, and hence no change of
frequency of the light leaving it. Einstein taught that the speed of light is
independent of the velocity of the source, and the speed of light is
constant in every direction with no red shift effect; hence, there is no change
of frequency, or red shift from its source.
A star going faster than the
speed of light is also in direct opposition to the Einstein theory that when an
object approaches the speed of light, its mass becomes infinite. Einstein
taught that nothing can move faster than the speed of light. Scientists have
not been able to explain how a star can move faster than the speed of light. So
who was wrong, Einstein, or all the scientists that believe Einstein's theories
while simultaneously refuting Einstein's theories? We will learn that both are
wrong.
It is possible that dust and
gas could decrease the frequency and the speed of light, especially if the
true nature of light is understood. With dust and gas in space, the greater the
distance, the more that both the frequency and the speed of light would be
decreased. Are scientists ignoring that possibility, or do they refuse to
discuss dust and gas in space because it would negate their religion, their
faith, their imagination and belief that the universe is billions of years old
and the Big Bang theory and their justification for evolution? Intelligent
Design Theory in the following
sections will present evidence that evolution based on big bang and super
massive black holes
in space theory, red shift and the theory of the universe expanding faster than
the speed of light is based on one false conclusion after another rather than on
science.
*See Intelligent Design Theory book offer below
Intelligent Design Theory HOME PAGE
Preface of Book Intelligent Design Theory
Contents of Book Intelligent Design Theory
Forward of Book Intelligent Design Theory
NEXT PAGE: I
PREVIOUS PAGE:
Buy Book Intelligent Design Theory
Copyright (C) 2007 Robert L. Laing All rights reserved